http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/7304.html
Executive Summary —
Coming up with new ideas and solving difficult
problems in modern organizations is increasingly accomplished through
collaboration and teamwork. Often when people collaborate to tackle a
knowledge-intensive project, they still need external help to achieve
their goals: advice, assistance with task completion, team coaching,
mentoring, and/or socio-emotional support. Yet we know little about the
helping process itself. Indeed, sometimes helping attempts are useless,
or worse. By conducting a field study of helping in a major design firm,
the authors of this paper analyzed how the helping process unfolded. In
particular, they focused on aspects of the process, differentiating
episodes that employees assessed as successful from those they deemed
unsuccessful. They discovered that the key differentiator was whether
the helper and the person being helped established "diagnostic
congruence" at the outset - a shared understanding of the state of the
project and what sort of help was needed. Overall, the study contributes
to our understanding of helping in organizations by discovering the
interactional influences on the success of a helping episode. It also
sheds light on help from a process perspective, highlights the
importance of timing in aspects of the process, and uncovers the
prominent role of emotion in perceptions of unsuccessful helping. Key
concepts include:
No comments:
Post a Comment